The #1 dedicated pheasant hunting website & community!
Find out more about our business services & solutions.
Welcome, New User

Go Back   Ultimate Pheasant Hunting Forum > Pheasant Hunting Discussions > Habitat Forum

Habitat Forum Discuss pheasant hunting habitat, land, farming, legislation, crp or conservation issues.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37  
Old 02-21-2010, 10:00 AM
mnmthunting's Avatar
mnmthunting mnmthunting is offline
UPH Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN-MT
Posts: 581
mnmthunting is on a distinguished road
Default

MAN COOT! did you hit the nail on the head or what.

I quote you.

"People doing these studies should just call me ,and stop wasting time on stupid science projects. Take that money spent in the name of science and put it toward habitat"

From mnmt.
I've been doing studies on studies.
Results are mostly decided before the study.

For example; All the studies done on pray vs predators. Say, if a researcher has any evidence of being anti predator in a resume he/she has no chance of a grant or a gov job in the first place.
Studies are done to impress the majority.
Another example. the general public would rather see a gray wolf then a deer, a Coyote then a pheasant, a raccoon then a mallard, a hawk then a grouse etc. Get the idea?

Ain't no study going to be done to tell the story behind MN loss of waterfowl. That would involve predation and ducks.
Or any other game species vs predators.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Ultimate Pheasant Hunting